Aggregator

Progress doesn't always make the news. This week, it should.

The post 5 pieces of good climate news that you probably missed recently appeared first on 350.

Source

America’s wetlands haven’t changed, but federal law regarding wetlands has never stopped changing in recent decades. Federal environmental and agricultural agencies and federal courts have taken a zig-zag course, alternately strengthening and weakening Clean Water Act (CWA) protections.  In recent years, courts and the two Trump Administrations have taken direct aim at the very definition... Read more »

The post Wetlands whipsaw: Three years after Sackett v. EPA appeared first on Flow Water Advocates.

A new autonomous vehicle authorization bill threatens the livelihoods of thousands of DC workers, risks wasting the time of hundreds of thousands in worsened traffic, explicitly permits yet another form of surveillance technology, and leaves any potential safety benefits in the hands of a Silicon Valley tech company.

The post Metro DC DSA Urges DC Council to Put Working People Before Autonomous Vehicle Companies appeared first on Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America.

Op-Ed by Victoria Higgins, CCAN Action Fund’s Virginia Director, initially published in Richmond Times Dispatch.   Make it make sense: At a time when Virginians’ bills are being hit by soaring fuel costs, yet again tied to never-ending wars overseas, Dominion is proposing what would be the second-largest gas plant in the United States. Never mind that […]

The post Why Virginians Are Paying Billions for Dominion’s Data Center Gas Plant  appeared first on Chesapeake Climate Action Network.

Source

What if the system designed to heal us is also quietly contributing to what makes us sick? It sounds contradictory, but it’s true.

The post Out of Pocket: the real cost of fossil fuels on our health and healthcare systems appeared first on 350.

The post CA oil permits skyrocket in 2026’s first quarter; majority are for Chevron wells appeared first on Last Chance Alliance.

LOS ANGELES, CA. — Environmental justice advocates, climate organizations, and community leaders are sounding the alarm following the rupture of a crude oil pipeline […]

The post Environmental Organizations Condemn East L.A. Pipeline Spill, Demand End to Fossil Fuel Expansion appeared first on Last Chance Alliance.

Shareholders, Indigenous leaders, human rights defenders, and environmental justice advocates converged on Chevron's Annual General Meeting today.

The Green Energy Option Program in the Philippines makes renewable energy no longer optional - it makes it practical!

The post The future of energy is here, and it’s saving schools money appeared first on 350.

California teachers have unknowingly invested billions of dollars in companies fueling the genocide in Gaza. Here’s how you can get involved in the historic divestment campaign targeting CalSTRS that is spreading across the state. 

Since October 2023, as Israel bombed and starved the people of Gaza and terrorized the entire region, the question of “how can we stop this?” has pumped unrelentingly through our hearts. We took to the streets and our electeds’ offices in protest and became increasingly frustrated each time we were ignored. 

Trying to appeal to some semblance of humanity in politicians using the democratic process has been enragingly ineffective at bringing about justice, or even a brief respite from violence, to our relatives in Palestine. To dismantle the death machine, we have to address what powers it. This monster that builds bombs and drops them requires vast amounts of resources. It is expensive to mine resources and build sophisticated killing devices. It’s expensive to hoist them in the air and position them exactly over a school. It requires a constant input of capital to keep this genocide going. The reason this death machine supply chain continues to murder families is because the violence generates profits for individual, corporate, and institutional investors. 

To stop the carnage, we must destroy those profits. And there’s a way we can do that together.

Divesting from Genocide

In 2005, Palestinian civil society launched the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions Movement (BDS) – modeled after the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa – to cut the artery sustaining the parasitic companies that leech from the circulation of capital and funnel it into atrocities. BDS pressures institutions to withdraw investments from Israel and companies enabling Israeli apartheid in order to make support for Israel unprofitable. Since 2024, dozens of institutions divested from Israeli apartheid, with DSA members and chapters – including mine – often contributing to these victories. And now California’s educators are joining the movement.

CalSTRS Divest is a state-wide campaign by teachers and retirees who object to their retirement contributions enabling the murder of Palestinian children. The California State Teachers’ Retirement System, or CalSTRS, is the pension fund for public school teachers, and it is truly massive. At $390 billion with 1 million members, it is the largest educator-only pension fund in the world, and the second-largest pension fund in the US. At this scale, the fund has real power in the world economy, and the choice of investments makes a difference in where capital is pumped, and consequently, which industries flourish, and which wither. 

Many educators, myself included, were shocked to learn that CalSTRS invests the money we set aside for our retirement in Israeli bonds and companies like Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Caterpillar, and Chevron that manufacture the bombs dropping on refugee camps in Rafah, the bulldozers flattening family homes in the West Bank, the planes and jet fuel used to bomb Palestinian hospitals, and the cameras and AI systems used to surveil families in the West Bank. In fact, CalSTRS currently has $2.7 billion invested in the Israeli genocide. While teachers struggle to find the resources to educate our students in overcrowded classrooms, our pension fund provides financing that allows a genocidal actor to murder classrooms full of students. 

As teachers, we often spend more time with the kids we teach than with our own families, and grow to love them. Taking teachers’ retirement money and using it to murder kids, then forcing retired teachers to live on blood money is sick and twisted. An unimaginably grotesque machination of empire, it turns the social welfare afforded to people “here” into a dependency on the depredation of people “there”. The CalSTRS Investment Board has tried to wheedle their way out of responsibility for its bureaucratic complicity by saying that without these investments, teachers would not have a safe way to retire. Looking beyond the disgusting nature of this argument that it is okay to kill babies if it makes money, research refutes the claim: Divesting completely from Israeli Apartheid would not significantly affect the returns of the portfolio. 

The CalSTRS Divest Campaign

Disgusted by the horrors that our pension system finances, current and retired teachers and educator unions across the state have joined the CalSTRS Divest campaign in droves. The potential victory here is huge: Not only is the divestment amount enough to make the complicit companies take notice themselves, but a divestment on this scale would set a powerful precedent for further divestment around the country.  If one of the country’s largest pension funds says no to blood money, it opens the door for organizers in states across the nation to demand that their retirement systems follow suit. 

Further, this divestment will be a huge labor win. Teaching is one of the few remaining professions in the United States with substantial union density and the guarantee of a pension. This divestment victory would show that workers will be heard when it comes to decisions regarding their retirement funds and continue the proud tradition of international labor solidarity.

This is not the first time teachers have won divestment.  In 2018, Bay Area teachers, horrified by increased incarceration of children as part of Trump’s immigration policy, convinced the CalSTRS Board to divest $12 million from private prisons with help from the California Federation of Teachers. Teachers have also won divestment from thermal coal and tobacco. Persistent organizing paid off in the past, and it is time to do it again!

Between the scale of a state-wide campaign and the conservatism of the CalSTRS Board, winning divestment will be a substantial challenge. While most teachers are not in favor of genocide, there are thousands of teachers across the state who are unaware of the contents of their retirement portfolio. We need to substantially increase our outreach in order to hold the CalSTRS board accountable to its own ethical investment policy. The re-election of many of these board members and those who appoint them is fast approaching, which gives us an opportunity to pressure them, but we need everyone’s help to act in time. 

Join the campaign!

DSA chapters from several areas including Sacramento and my chapter in the East Bay are organizing to strengthen this movement. But since the pension fund represents teachers across the state of California, we need all DSA chapters in California to engage to make divestment a reality. Here’s what we can do to help win this campaign:

1. Develop connections with public educators and teacher union locals in our respective areas and ensure that they pass resolutions supporting CalSTRS Divest. Sign up for the Teach-In on June 13 to learn more!

2. Get your chapter to adopt a resolution supporting CalSTRS Divest (template here) and be prepared to mobilize attendance at a quarterly CalSTRS Board meeting (stay tuned here)

This will be a significant undertaking with its share of challenges. But we are not starting from scratch. CalSTRS Divest has done tremendous groundwork to get to this point and is ready to teach your chapter how to get plugged into the campaign. This genocide runs on money. Together, we will starve the beast and feed the children. 

To find out more about how to get involved, please fill out our interest form at ebdsa.us/calstrsdivest.

A Flock camera

Living under capitalism, we are all used to the enshittification of everything it touches. One of the worst contemporary examples is the increasing expansion of the surveillance state. Cautionary tales about the dangers of mass surveillance and building a panopticon like Orwell’s 1984 have instead been taken as instruction manuals. The most glaring case study is automated license plate readers (ALPRs) represented by Flock Safety, the largest purveyor of the technology. As socialists, we must organize to oppose those who would seek to turn a profit at the expense of human needs.

Contrary to what proponents of ALPRs claim, mass surveillance is a major threat to public safety rather than an effective tool to support it. These unblinking cameras create a massive 24/7 surveillance dragnet that provides time-stamped location data of every vehicle that drives by regardless of whether they are involved in a crime or not. Based on data from May 5 for the Flock transparency portal for the city of Palo Alto, less than 0.5% of captured vehicle data was related to previously designated ‘hot lists’ involved with a crime. The number of arrests or cases closed per ALPR recording of innocent passersby is guaranteed to be even lower. Since data is typically stored for 30 days or more, police have the ability to recreate your movements over the past month without a warrant, finding out where you live, where you work, where your children go to school, and where you organize even without any articulable suspicion that you have been involved in a crime.

The threats to our collective safety are not simply hypothetical. Police have used nationwide ALPRs to hunt down a woman seeking abortion. They’ve violated First Amendment rights by searching for people engaged in peaceful protest. The countless examples of ICE and CBP illegally accessing ALPR data show that the prohibition on sharing data out of state (illegal for a decade in California) is insufficient to protect our privacy. After ICE shot Marimar Martinez five times, they used historical ALPR data to trace her movements over the previous month to find support for their baseless claim she was a domestic terrorist. Repeated cases show police officers using Flock to stalk former partners. Flock employees have accessed video feeds pointed at a children’s gymnastics center, showing these cameras are not just about license plates but instead are part of a broader surveillance network. It was just earlier this year Amazon paid for a Super Bowl ad to announce their ultimately aborted partnership between Flock and Ring. Data from multiple streams including and beyond ALPRs get integrated into regional intelligence fusion centers where democratic oversight is limited and there is no guarantee local policies will be adhered to.

All of these violations of our rights and threats to public safety are enabled by a tool for which claims of efficacy are dubious at best. False positive hits from ALPRs are a consistent problem. A Black woman in San Francisco was pulled over and held at gunpoint due to a mistaken ALPR hit. Police handcuffed a 12-year-old in New Mexico when an ALPR misread a “2” as a “7”. A Black man in Toledo was mauled by a police dog after an erroneous notification (this time a “7” read as “2”). A man in Colorado can no longer use his vehicle because he keeps getting pulled over after police recorded both “O” and “0” in a data entry error mandated by policy. Even if the cameras were 100% accurate all the time, they would still be ineffective  -  swapping license plates is enough to fool the cameras despite claims of creating a “vehicle fingerprint”. Police pulled over a woman in Oakland in March after her license plates were swapped despite the fact that she had a silver Honda Fit and the crime-involved car was a black Honda Civic. After the mass shooting at Brown University, the killer swapped license plates on his vehicle and was able to murder a professor in Massachusetts. Police in San Diego had a specific car and license plate to search, but could not act in time to prevent murders at an Islamic center even with ALPRs. The claim ALPRs support public safety is not supported by the data; in fact the contrary is the case - they harm public safety.

Within California, SB 34 requires ALPR operators implement a usage and privacy policy in addition to forbidding sharing of data with out of state agencies. Even private entities are required to publish such a policy at risk of $2,500 per violation. Time and again, carefully crafted policies are violated by ALPR vendors. The city of Mountain View required written approval from the police chief and agreement to the city’s policies before sharing data, but unauthorized federal and statewide agencies gained access. Flock turned on an illegal nationwide lookup tool without telling local agencies, resulting in ALPR data sharing with out of state agencies in multiple cities. At an April 2026 council meeting in Sunnyvale, city staff revealed that Flock only just implemented two factor authentication to access ALPR data after the press reported on data breaches in Mountain View at the end of January. Although Flock Safety is the largest vendor of ALPRs and therefore has the most information available on data breaches, it is not a company-specific problem. Motorola Solutions provides cameras for UC Merced and allowed CBP to illegally access ALPR data. Many California cities grant access across jurisdictions, so if your city is currently sharing or has previously shared with El Cajon PD then your local data has also been accessible to out of state agencies due to their flagrant violation of California law and is at risk of multi-million dollar lawsuits.

Effective tools?

Proponents of ALPRs claim they are effective tools for preventing crime locally. The reality of data access undercuts that claim. From August 2024 to December 2025, the Mountain View Police Department performed approximately 25,000 searches of the city’s ALPR data while outside agencies performed more than 3,000,000 searches. In other words, only 0.8% of searches were done locally and the overwhelming majority were from external and mostly unauthorized entities. Proponents also claim that anyone concerned with privacy should turn their focus to the location tracking data provided by smart phones. This argument fails to take into account that there is a difference in kind with the type of data. One can opt out of smart phone location tracking but cannot opt out of ALPR data collection. Furthermore, a private company having data is also different from it being collected by the State and accessible to law enforcement. Police require a warrant before they can access your location data but no warrants are needed to search ALPR data. The persistent Fourth Amendment violations have led to numerous lawsuits against private entities, vendor Flock Safety, and local cities, including Los Angeles, Oakland, and several lawsuits against San Jose.

Mass movement required 

The Tech Bro Dystopia we already inhabit can only be effectively opposed if we organize together in a mass movement. You can start the fight in your local chapter by submitting FOIA requests regarding ALPRs for local cities in your area. Ask for all communications between city officials and any ALPR vendors, but don’t be surprised if it takes longer than allowed or if you get back files with redactions that would make the editors of the Epstein files blush. If you have Flock as a vendor like most cities in California, your city may have got a sales pitch from Flock employees and illegally eschewed a competitive bidding process in the same style as Trump. Make requests for data access logs that disclose agencies who searched your local data and reasons for the search. Just know that police are told to be “as vague as permissible” and Flock recently restricted responses to a pre-approved dropdown menu of reasons. Don’t be surprised if you find federal and out of state agencies on the access list in violation of state law, but do use that knowledge in your fight against surveillance capitalism. Also know that absence of ICE in data access logs does not mean the agency never accessed your data - a 2021 Biden era DHS policy mandates that ALPR operators leave no trace of ICE in audit logs except for the logs available only to ICE.

The standard Flock contract you can get from a FOIA request contains several objectionable provisions in the fine print your elected representatives may not have realized when approving it (assuming that Flock didn’t change the contract language from what the city proposed as they have been shown to do). Despite claims that only the city controls the data, Flock reserves the right to grant access without a warrant if they have a good faith belief it supports a legitimate law enforcement purpose. Even though Flock claims they just capture license plates and a vehicle fingerprint, their patent claims ability to identify people by personal or immutable characteristics like age, clothing, gait, gender, height, race, and weight. Although Flock claims cities own all data, the company reserves an exclusive, worldwide license to keep a fraction of everyone’s data to train their AI models. They need a worldwide license because they exploit workers in the Global South for model training. The real business model for Flock is to sell fear to our local police departments so taxpayer dollars are used to lease cameras to let Flock get the thing it actually cares about: our data. WE are the product; Flock cares about making a profit, not public safety. That became abundantly clear when the company installed two unauthorized cameras in Cambridge, MA before being kicked to the curb for the violation of trust.

To force the surveillance state out of your local city, get ready to mobilize to a city council meeting when the ALPR contract is up for renewal. Build a coalition with allied organizations and be prepared to pursue an inside/outside strategy. Set up a letter writing campaign to send messages to the relevant body (this is relatively easy with dues-funded tools each chapter gets from National). Some organizers should seek meetings to lobby council members. That approach can let you assess their position, defuse any pro-surveillance talking points, and find allies to raise questions during the meeting that you submitted in advance with your letters. If an ALPR contract is not up for renewal anytime soon, repeatedly mobilize for public comment on non-agendized items to demand a contract discussion until the topic can no longer be ignored.

At the same time, we must apply pressure to make supporting ALPRs politically intolerable. Write op-eds for your local publications. Create a document with talking points for public comment (our coalition can help you, see contact details at the end of this article). Hold a rally before the ALPR contract or surveillance use policy meeting and invite the media with a press release articulating your position. Balance speakers on the topic with chants from the crowd (my personal favorite: MOVE Flock, Get out the Bay!), then hold a public comment training session right before the meeting starts.

Tim MacKenzie tells the Mountain View City Council in February to end its contract with Flock Safety

Track record: successes and setbacks

In Silicon Valley, we’ve seen success and setbacks. At the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, we used our one minute of public comment time to introduce ourselves and read as much of the coalition letter as we could, with the next person picking up where the previous one left off. In Mountain View, we had speakers pool time to give ten minutes each to two coalition members to read through our entire letter at the head of a marathon public comment session. We are fighting to remove Flock ALPRs from Stanford University, the largest landowner in Silicon Valley. The County Supervisors set a surveillance use policy to remove Flock as an ALPR vendor and had two votes that were in favor of forbidding the technology entirely. Mountain View unanimously canceled the Flock contract and said it would not pursue other ALPR vendors. Just before those decisions, Los Altos Hills chose not to renew their Flock contract. Our neighbors to the south in Santa Cruz were the first in California to terminate their Flock contract in January. On the other hand, in April the city of Sunnyvale unanimously voted to keep the Flock contract and East Palo Alto decided against changing the Flock contract after it was brought up for reconsideration. The City of Santa Clara received an informational report on ALPRs without any action and Palo Alto is trying to sweep massive data breaches under the rug.

If your city doesn’t seem ready to cancel its ALPR contract, fight for stronger guardrails in the surveillance use policy. You can push for a shorter data retention period - San Jose dropped from one year to one month of data retention, and ALPR data in New Hampshire is deleted within three minutes if the vehicle is not on a pre-approved hot list. The demands in our coalition letter pushed San Jose to prohibit cameras near sensitive areas like abortion clinics, places of worship, consulate offices, and health care facilities providing gender affirming care. Demand a surveillance use policy that requires any ALPR vendor to meet all your guardrails for public safety, including the requirement for a judicial warrant for any search of data.

A better world is possible, but only if we organize to build it together. A National Week of Action against ALPRs is planned for August 16-22. You can access an organizer’s toolkit our coalition has built if you want to start anti-ALPR organizing in your chapter by emailing ca@stopalpr.org.

Despite the use of dashes in the body of the text, every word was chosen by a human mind and no generative AI was used for this piece.